How do REQUIRED, REQUIRES_NEW, and NESTED transaction propagation differ?

Compares joining an existing transaction, suspending it for an independent transaction, and using a savepoint-backed nested scope.

1Say itAnswer out loud first

2CompareCompare with Core answer

3RefineRefine with Stronger and Advanced

TL;DR

REQUIRED joins the current transaction or starts one if none exists, so it is the normal default for one composed unit of work. REQUIRES_NEW suspends the outer transaction and starts an independent physical transaction with its own commit or rollback. NESTED normally uses a savepoint inside one physical transaction, allowing part of the work to roll back to that point when the transaction manager and resource support it.

Full answer below

Practice focus

Logical and physical transactions, suspension, savepoints, rollback-only state, pool pressure, and valid use cases.

Answer first

Answer path

Core answer first, then checkpoints toward a stronger answer.

Start
Core answer
Start here. This is the direct spoken answer to practice first.
Overview
Propagation describes what happens when a transactional method is called while a transaction may already exist.
REQUIRED joins the current transaction or starts one if none exists, so it is the normal default for one composed unit of work. REQUIRES_NEW suspends the outer transaction and starts an independent physical transaction with its own commit or rollback. NESTED normally uses a savepoint inside one physical transaction, allowing part of the work to roll back to that point when the transaction manager and resource support it.
Checkpoint
Stronger answer
Optional upgrade with examples, trade-offs, and sharper phrasing.
An inner REQUIRED scope can mark the shared transaction rollback-only; if outer code tries to commit, Spring may report an unexpected rollback. REQUIRES_NEW can commit even when the outer transaction later fails, which is useful only when that independent outcome is intentional. It also needs another connection while the outer one remains held, so concurrent use can exhaust a small pool. NESTED is not a portable substitute for a separate transaction and is commonly tied to JDBC savepoint support.

Review signals

Use these to catch weak phrasing, shallow reasoning, and risky claims.

Common mistakesCandidateCommon mistakesMistakes that weaken the answer or signal shallow understanding.Open details

Details

Calling REQUIRES_NEW a nested savepoint.
Using REQUIRES_NEW without accounting for another connection.
Catching an exception and assuming a shared transaction can still commit.

How do REQUIRED, REQUIRES_NEW, and NESTED transaction propagation differ?

Practice focus

Answer path

Overview

Review signals

Follow-up prompts

Continue practice

Go deeper

Tech stacks

Skill areas

Suggest an improvement

Found this answer useful?