Start here. This is the direct spoken answer to practice first.
Why this question matters
This question checks whether growth shows up in behavior, not only in a polished apology. The story needs a real change that other people could notice.
Use this as an adaptable model, not a story to claim as your own. Replace the project, constraints, your actions, collaborators, outcome, evidence, and reflection with truthful details from your experience.
I received feedback that my PRs were technically solid but too large and hard to review. My first reaction was to explain why the work was connected, but after looking at the review history I saw the pattern. Reviewers were taking longer, and comments mixed feature behavior with cleanup. I changed by splitting work into smaller PRs: one behavior change, one focused refactor, and clear notes about what to review.