What is the difference between exposing a read-only collection and using an immutable collection in C#?

Read-only views versus immutable collections

Separates restricted mutation access from a stable immutable value and chooses snapshots or structural sharing deliberately.

1Say itAnswer out loud first

2CompareCompare with Core answer

3RefineRefine with Stronger and Advanced

TL;DR

A read-only interface or wrapper prevents the receiver from mutating through that reference, but the owner may still change the backing collection. An immutable collection returns a new collection for each logical change, leaving the previous value unchanged. I expose a read-only view when one owner legitimately mutates state and consumers only need observation. I use an immutable value when readers need a stable snapshot that cannot change underneath them.

Full answer below

Practice focus

Read-only wrappers and interfaces, backing collection mutation, immutable snapshots, structural sharing, publication, allocation, and ownership.

Answer first

Answer path

Core answer first, then checkpoints toward a stronger answer.

Start
Core answer
Start here. This is the direct spoken answer to practice first.
Why this question matters
Read-only access and immutable state solve different problems. One restricts what a caller can do through an API, while the other gives all observers a stable value.
A read-only interface or wrapper prevents the receiver from mutating through that reference, but the owner may still change the backing collection. An immutable collection returns a new collection for each logical change, leaving the previous value unchanged. I expose a read-only view when one owner legitimately mutates state and consumers only need observation. I use an immutable value when readers need a stable snapshot that cannot change underneath them.
Checkpoint
Stronger answer
Optional upgrade with examples, trade-offs, and sharper phrasing.
For example, List<T>.AsReadOnly() reflects later changes to the original list, so it is not a historical snapshot. Calling ToArray() creates a separate snapshot, although mutable objects inside it are still shared. and use structural sharing so updates reuse much of the old structure rather than copying everything. Their operation costs differ from or , so I do not substitute them mechanically in a write-heavy hot path.

Review signals

Use these to catch weak phrasing, shallow reasoning, and risky claims.

Common mistakesCandidateCommon mistakesMistakes that weaken the answer or signal shallow understanding.Open details

Details

Calling a read-only wrapper immutable while its backing collection still changes.
Copying the outer collection and assuming mutable elements were deeply copied.
Using persistent immutable collections without considering write cost and allocation.
Publishing a mutable collection while another thread is still building it.

What is the difference between exposing a read-only collection and using an immutable collection in C#?

Practice focus

Answer path

Why this question matters

Review signals

Follow-up prompts

Continue the section

Tech stacks

Skill areas

Suggest an improvement